Iran is a threat . Each part of the argument was well supported except for the link between Iran 's dishonesty and its potentiality as a threat . Merely evaluating Iran 's capability of building a bomb through opinions of its neighbors and the presence of nuclear reactors are not sensitive to nuclear politics that involves concepts like Mutually Assured Destruction (MAD . Analyze the writer 's language . What is the writer 's tone ? Why might he or she have chosen this tone...











SUBJECTS

