Adversarial and inquisitorial attorneys did not diverge in the number of facts they collected when the evidence was ambiguous (50 percent in favour of one disputant 50 percent in favour of the other disputant ) or favoured the adversarial attorney 's client . However , when the evidence was more devastating against the adversarial client 's position , the adversarial attorney bought a larger number of facts than did the inquisitorial attorney . The researchers also examined the degree of overall bias in the presentation...











SUBJECTS

