Rate this paper
  • Currently rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.50 / 2
Paper Topic:

The qualities of the peacekeeper and the counterinsurgent are the same. Discuss


The contemporary political environment calls for making exact distinctions between peacekeeping and counterinsurgencies . Political professionals currently face the growing confusion between the two notions . Even in the light of the increasing similarities between the two different processes , peacekeeping and counterinssame . They carry certain differences and different political implications . Under the changing political conditions some attempts were made to connect these two doctrines , yet objectivity is the major concern in political science : even in the light of certain similarities peacekeeping and counterins The after Cold-War period

was marked by the drastically changing conditions and challenges of military conflicts all over the world military interventions have turned into being intrastate , and the military missions were mainly conducted in extremely volatile and complex environments . In that challenging environment , political research faced one of the major theoretical conflicts : whether peacekeeping and counterinsor whether they were different . The difficulties of different UN missions led the majority of observers to conclude that the mechanism of traditional peacekeeping was only of limited utility in the managing of intrastate types of conflicts ' Several opinions are found in literature upon the subject of peacekeeping vs . counterinsthe one hand , Jones and Riley state that counterinsupdated form of peacekeeping , called for by the new political conditions in the new post-Cold War political environment . These assertions were provoked by the similarities between counterinsOn the other hand , Lovelock referred to the idea that peacekeeping was an outdated form of intervening military and civil conflicts , and that counterins I would rather agree with the latter , because even despite the continuous misleading assertions about the similarity and identity of peacekeeping and counterinsdifferent . The majority of the researched literary sources suggest that although many distinctions between the two political and military phenomena are concealed and require additional research , they can still be distinguished and analyzed through the prism of political and military factors

The notion of assertive peacekeeping has been heavily influenced by the experience of the post-Cold War `grey area ' operations . Few peacekeeping operations during the Cold War possessed the characteristics common to the post-Cold War environment . Although a consensus has emerged , the relatively few cases from which relevant principles can be drawn to guide the development of new doctrine undermines somewhat its empirical validity , this despite assertions that the doctrine has both empirical and theoretical support (Moskaitis 1999 , 78

In to produce a relevant explanation to what counterinsis , we have to clearly understand the characteristics of counterinsprinciples were described by numerous authors , and many of them intersect and are synonymic to each other . First of all counterinscomprehensive plan and a clear overall objective that can guide the actions of all actors within the conflict zone ' Peacekeeping is also a planned operation . This principle is absolutely similar to that of peacekeeping , yet there are some differences . Peacekeeping is the political aim in itself - it does not require having other similar aims because one of its essential characteristics is neutrality Simultaneously , counterinsare undertaken , the mission is clearly determined , because counterinsconflict


Not the Essay You're looking for? Get a custom essay (only for $12.99)