lets put pornography back in the closet

The main point of this essay is that even though free speech protects a lot of things it doesn 't protect every kind of free ' speech because there are boundaries when one is forced to look instead of given the choice to look or not . The author 's purpose in writing it is to show that she is in agreement with most of the foundational aspects of the American Constitution but that she , in a very patriotic way or even a humanist way does not believe that pornography should be protected by free

speech . Her attitude is challenging to precisely pin down because she seems so loyal to what the supreme court ultimately decides . While it 's reasonable to believe that she favors making the distinction that pornography should not be protected because it expounds on a hatred of women and is too prevalent to be simply ignored , she leaves it to the courts to decide in the end . So we can say that she has the status of an invested concern that aims towards a neutral attempt that allows for the judicial process to do its work

Some of her most provocative and supporting details are when she clearly outlines a difference in what was being protected by the free speech amendment . It shifts from the political to the violent , from political statements to personal biases and intense hatreds . While political statements can be very biased and members may share intense hatreds this often is not as explicit and...