Should juvenile offenders be tried and punished as adults?

In view of an adolescents lesser capacity to moderate impulsive behavior , deterrence is unlikely and "retribution " - based on the false assumption of adult level culpability is misguided and cruel . The encounters of these two circumstances do not blend with the maturity and culpability of the youth offender

Therefore , testing the question as to yes , trialing adolescents as adults and sentencing him or her to the option of the death penalty , is cruel and unusual based on factors of maturity and responsibility

Two ways to determine the development of an adolescent

's , mental satiability and perceptive station on the scientific judgment of psychology and the verdict of the court supported by the evidence gathered . In other terms , the penalties of the offense must fit the degree of the criminal 's maturity and understanding

The adolescent mind works differently than that of an adult . Parents know it , courts have stated it , and legislatures have presumed it for decades or more (McLaughlin . Now , new scientific reasoning has shed a light in the darkness of the hole between adulthood and childhood Science characterizes the deficiencies of the adolescent mind by explaining the actions committed by a youth . Scientists have concluded this with the presentation of new technology breakthroughs , such as , the high-resolution structure called magnetic resonance imaging (MRI (ABA 2004 . This new technology examines the different brain developing stages from childhood to adolescents to adulthood . MRI studies show the transactions between eras of brain development to conclude a logical and scientific composite of an adolescent 's mental being

The scan exposes the development of the maturity processes through the frontal lobe and shows the distinct way that it affects the brain function , first with myelination and then with pruning . The scans of the myelin illustrate the pathway of impulse control , risk assessment , and...