The differences on sex education between public and private school

konetzformynachaloformyCompare and Contrast the differences on sex education between public and private schools in the United States

The public controversy centered around sex education in schools has shifted . Where the question was once whether or not sexual education should be taught in public schools , the fray now questions the methodology of what is being taught . Analyzing the situation with sex education both in private and public schools it is obvious that the difference exists only in the choice of methodology . The division exist between advocates of an abstinence-only approach versus comprehensive

sexuality education (abstinence-plus approach . Also we can not say that private schooling mostly prefers the first approach and the public school teachers keeps the second one . It would be a gross mistake as the content of sexuality education curricula in America varies widely by region , by school district and , sometimes , by classroom . We can only familiarize ourselves with these approaches and trace their development as they both can be found in private and public schools and , according to the approach applied , we will see the difference . So , below you can find two types of sex education that can be found both in private and public schools

Over the last several years , Congress has emphasized funding abstinence-only programs over comprehensive sexuality education President Bush and the leaders in Congress have called for parity ' in funding between abstinence-only sex education and family planning , safe sex programs . The abstinence-only approach to sex education is not supported by the extensive body of scientific research on what works to protect young people from HIV /AIDS , sexually transmitted infections , and unplanned pregnancy . An assessment of the peer-reviewed , published research reveals no evidence that abstinence-only programs delay sexual initiation or reduce sexually transmitted infections or pregnancy . By contrast , credible research clearly demonstrates that some comprehensive sex education programs can achieve positive behavioral changes among

young people and that these programs do not encourage young people to initiate sexual activity earlier or have more sexual partners

The growing prominence of the abstinence-only approach will likely have serious unintended consequences by denying young people access to the information they need to protect themselves . And abstinence-only programs risk alienating the young people at highest risk of negative health outcomes by promoting one size fits all ' vision of adolescence that matches the true experiences of only a minority of youth

Unprotected sexual activity among young people can have severe personal social and financial costs . Unprotected sex among youth results in nearly four million sexually transmitted infections each year , many with serious long term consequences . The great majority of the 10 ,000 annual new HIV infections among people under 22 occurs through sexual activity The United States still has the highest rates of sexually transmitted infections and teen pregnancy of any industrialized nation

a Medicine of the National Academy of Science has recommended eliminating federal , state and local requirements that public funds be used for abstinence-only education . And surveys consistently show that the

public wants schools to deliver strong abstinence messages...