Rate this paper
  • Currently rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5.00 / 2
Paper Topic:

critics

Name

Professor

Course

Date

Critics

William Faulkner 's A Rose for Emily has been the subject of critical analysis and scrutiny long after its publication , most likely due to the renowned author 's distinct use of elements in his short story . Much of the short story 's notoriety takes credit from the elements ' nature to spawn a great narrative , which it effectively did . In light of such groundbreaking accounts , the significance of modern analyses arises in to understand the true literary meaning behind the elements used in A

Rose for Emily

Lawrence Rodgers initially writes about how William Faulkner carved his interest for the concept of detection in A Rose for Emily and how the story is aesthetically crafted despite the complexities in elements Rodgers discusses how Faulkner integrates the essential factors of a detective story : mystery , secrecy , and unpredictable plot development and twist in A Rose for Emily (474-74 . Rodgers furthers that the non-linear filter in which the events took place together with the plot the narrator , and characters all cooperate in relaying how A Rose for Emily is to be understood , by making each element an essential part in solving the mystery within the story (Rodgers , 478-79

George Dillon 's premise on the Faulkner classic , on the other hand stimulates that a more general approach to the story as well as its comprehensibility , progression , and variation (482 . Dillon does this by initially focusing on the events in A Rose for Emily and the reasons behind occurrence of the aforementioned events together with assessment of other criticisms about the story (483 . Dillon implies that understanding Faulkner 's short story will mean a deep analysis of the main character 's (Emily Grier ) motives for her actions and drawing inferences from the open ended nature of the events in the story (483-84 . Unlike Rodgers ' claims , Dillon suggests that the hidden meaning behind the story is to be unraveled by readers instead of being spoiled by the narrator (Rodgers , 486-87

The scholarly critiques by Lawrence Rodgers and George Dillon present and defend their respective arguments well . However , Rodgers dissecting element by element approach to the story tends to misguide readers on the true context and meaning of the literary piece . This is because an explanation of elements used within a particular literary piece does not contribute to a reader 's understanding of the story as a whole . Rodgers even suggests that the story 's ending perfectly adheres to the principles of a detective novel , but such explanations do not element used is given . Dillon 's emphasis on the entirety of A Rose for Emily calls for readers ' analytical ability in identifying the story 's hidden literary meaning and significance , rather than just shallowly explaining the reason as to why A Rose for Emily should be considered a detective story

Works Cited

Dillon , George , L . Styles of Reading . Norton Introduction to Literature . Ed . Allison Booth , Paul Hunter Kelly Mays . New York : W .W Norton , 2006

Rodgers , Lawrence , R . We all said 'She...

Not the Essay You're looking for? Get a custom essay (only for $12.99)