case

[ ?] case [ ?]

1 :Format for case analysis language Format for Case Analyses

1 .Address all pertinent issues and points of ethical conflict

2 . Consider the legitimate expectations of all interested parties

3 . Propose possible actions and describe the probable consequences of those actions

4 . Identify and discuss the obligations /duties of the protagonist of the case (what professional duty is at issue

5 . Cite any pertinent institutional policies or Federal regulations governing this case

6 . write 1 page per case

Format for Case Analyses ? Address

all pertinent issues and points of ethical conflict ? Consider the legitimate expectations of all interested parties ? Propose possible actions and describe the probable consequences of those actions ? Identify and discuss the obligations /duties of the protagonist of the case (what professional duty is at issue ? Cite any pertinent institutional policies or Federal regulations governing this case ? write 1 page per case

CASE 1 : Authorship and peer review (1 page

Dr . Mary Travers , a well-funded scientist , leaves medium university to take a position at Large Medical Center University . Dr . Levi Stubbs , the departmental chair , assigns another faculty member , Dr . Carl Wilson , to Dr . Traver 's former office lab . A few months later . Dr . Carl Wilson comes across some of dr .Travers 's s in a cabinet drawer . In looking through these materials , he discovers what looks to be a completed draft of a manuscript written by Dr . Travers . What attracts Dr . Wilson 's attention is that the title page lists Dr . Travers 's address as Large Medical Center University . No mention of or acknowledgement of Medium University is noted in the manuscript . Dr . Wilson is puzzled by this but does not take any action . Several months later , a authored by Dr Travers appears in the Journal of biology Chemistry . Dr . Wilson notes that the published is virtually identical to the manuscript he discovered in Dr . Traver 's former office . He has a good appreciation of the science involved and believes that she could not have accomplished the work reported in the few months that she has been a Large Medical Center University . What 's more , the acknowledgments in the printed thank a technician whom Dr . Travers supervised at Medium University . Dr Wilson believes that Dr . Travers is attempting to demonstrate her research prowess by convincing her supervisor 's at Large Medical Center University that her research program is up running at full throttle . Dr Wilson brings departmental chair Stubbs the manuscript and a copy of the published . He suggests that Dr . Travers has committed scientific misconduct by deliberately falsifying information in the manuscript Commenting , So Levi , the ball 's in your court ' Dr . Wilson gracefully exits the chair 's office . Dr . Stubbs comes to you , the department 's resident expert in research ethics , and asks what he should do . What 's your advice for him

In this case , the extent to which the university resources have been utilized needs to be taken into consideration . If...