business law

To begin with Herbert Dull who is 17 years old is a minor and any contract he enters into is valid when it is beneficial to him . Raising his hand in-class to his lecturer , offering to sell his car at 1500 it was a mere invitation to treat which is not an offer . An invitation treat is where one displays his property for sale by giving his address and telephone number to the class showed that it was a mere invitation to treat to all class members including Dr . Wills . The email from

Hildegard Watson which stated to have accepted the offer was not acceptance but an offer to buy the car at the stated price . The correspondence which never reached Herbert has no meaning in this case

Therefore , there is no enforceable contract between Herbert and Watson This means that Watson cannot enforce any contract , however if there was a communication between the two not with the whole class it could have been an acceptance of the offer , but it is not the case

The meeting between Herbert and Jim Quick on the 16th December and an offer of 1450 was a case of an offer not acceptance to buy a car which was under invitation to treat . In this case Herbert accepted the offer removing the conditions of delivery , this changed the terms of contract In this case there is a valid contract accept the time of delivery they have differed

The cheque which was received of 1500 from Watson cannot be enforced since the terms of delivery were not in agreement . Therefore Jim Quick contract was valid . In these two instances there is only one valid contract except they disagreed on the payment period . He should return the cherub of Watson since there is no valid contract between him and the seller

The arrangement between Herbert and Las Vegas mob to pay the dept at a rate of 100dollars is valid and enforceable if the agreement was at arms length . Therefore changing the mind by Big Joe is a bridge of contract This means that the contract between the two should be enforceable

In the first two instances , we can say that there is only one contract between Jim and Herbert but there is no contract between Watson and Herbert , which is not enforceable . I will advice Herbert to return his claque and forget about the contract since there was no one in the first place . However I will advice him to deliver his car to Jim upon clearing the whole amount if the terms were installments . If the terms were not installments they were cash on delivery , then Jim is trying to bridge the contract by paying in installments . But the implied conditions here show that Herbert has accepted a payment in installment through using part of the cash paid by Jim

The oral agreement between Las Vegas and Herbart is a contract since a valid contract can be oral or written . The reason that Big...