Write an essay about the Fairness Doctrine

In my opinion , Weil 's ideas are too idealistic , for although people may indeed love their neighbors as much as they love themselves theless , this could only happen if all would indeed subscribe to this kind of philosophical thinking . It is quite inevitable for people to dominate other things , and this is something that Weil herself recognizes , as she states that indeed inequality is something that we cannot demise . Yet she proceed on implying that humans can in some way become compassionate to other people or feel and share the pain of other

br people

This is simply implausible even if she argued that there is a universal link that determines compassion as an obligation to other people , still it is deeply imbedded in human being 's nature and personhood that he /she must strive for him /herself with or without the regard for other people Her ideal morality and universal justice cannot be attained in our society and is only possible in a hypothetical realm where people may indeed recognize his /her obligation to other people

It might also work well in particular instances upon a serious contemplation and dedication to religion or to a morality that corresponds to the same ideals . For example , in instances like those done by Christ , helping other people without the regard of what will happen to yourself , is something that can indeed be treated to be an instance in support of Weil 's claims . However , one must not forget to take into account the fact that somehow there can be personal interest involved or such and such actions are only plausible in certain circumstances and not in others . Thus , my assessment of Weil 's philosophy is implausible and too idealistic

Works Cited

Weil , Simone . Waiting for God . New York : First Perennial Classics . 2001

Love...