Rate this paper
  • Currently rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5.00 / 3
views 1485 | downloads 818
Paper Topic:

Winston Churchill

Winston Churchill 's Wartime Leadership

Brief Introduction

Winston Churchill (1874-1965 ) quoted : victory at all costs , victory in spite of all terror , victory however long and hard the road may be , for without victory there is no survival . The relationship of civilian and military during the World War was in pursuance of victory for democracy to exist . As war ended , the underlying considerations of relationship regard the constitutional ascription of civilian supremacy over the military . On the other hand , there might be politico-technical understanding that undermines the civilian interactions to military

affairs . Apparently , the civilian-military relationship is caught between the rationale of political leadership and decision-making . This will discuss Eliot Cohen 's case study of Winston Churchill 's wartime roles in civil-military relations , and relate the past experience to present day strategies of political leaders

Churchill 's supreme command

In the book `Supreme Command : Soldiers , Statesmen , and Leadership in Wartime ' authored by Eliot Cohen (2002 , has presented the case study of active ' political leadership relating Winston Churchill as a soldier and a statesman in the World War I and II . According to Cohen Churchill 's great challenge was to meddle ' in the civilian-military political affairs for the allied countries to win the war . Churchill 's political leadership pondered a civic duty ' in the civilian and military organizations . The style of leadership ensures civilian interest ' in Churchill 's war management , wherein never dictated his military leaders but rather relentlessly encouraged and probed them Thus , Churchill mingles with a rule of thumb as a soldier and not by political dictum of a statesman . Summarily , Cohen 's case study validates Churchill 's character of political leadership as a strategy applicable during wartime

Reflection and conclusion

Churchill 's political leadership in civil-military affairs may challenge the US ' post-modernist command supremacy , like in Vietnam and Iraq . The issue on general 's revolt ' has burned bridges of diplomacy and broken the long silence of retired generals probing the appointment of Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld . The CBS News pointed out each of these men played by the rules , retiring before speaking out . Similarly , the Washington Post has cited strong sympathies accusing President Bush "catastrophically flawed plan ' of invading Iraq in 2003

On the contrary , military experts viewed general 's revolt as a retired conscience ' and top brass attack ' to the US military-industrial complex , a dissent ' of varied protest [with Rumsfeld 's appointment] . The military experts analyzed the color ' of politics could be highlighting the loathing thoughts , in which attributed to a ricochet ' from managing a war to being pension recipients . It may be reflected , Churchill 's assimilation of political leadership in the middle of the warfare stood under the umbrella ' of allied forces , in which political bickering ' has no chance to appear Churchill has significantly captured the hearts and minds of soldiers by mingling ' and emerging the showmanship of a warlord . In conclusion the present leadership in military-industrial complex must be characterized by emerging civic duty to minimize the casualties of war and narrow the warpath , possessing...

3 pages
35.0 KB
Free sing-up

Not the Essay You're looking for? Get a custom essay (only for $12.99)