Why do price controls require hospitals to make a trade-off between quality of medical services and number of patients served?
One of the very recent bills that most of the Congress in the world is the one that concerns the prices of medical expenditures or most commonly known as the price controls bill . Stated in this bill government can interfere medical institutions in fixing prices for expenditures such as cost of operations and the price of medicines Also , the government subsidizes expenditures , a part or even whole of the medical cost for a patient The idea of price controls may seem beneficial since the government can make the prices low so that
The idea of price controls may seem beneficial since the government can make the prices low so that
the public can enjoy health care for low prices also . Somehow , this will cost many problems first of all patients have different degree of sickness . For example , two patients are diagnose with cataract , if one is worse than other , then the medical personnel would expend a little more on the severe patient . Abiding the price control policy , they will both pay the same amount
The problem about this is whether the price assigned is too low or too high for expenditure . If the price is set too high , the quality of medical service would be better since they are funded with more money now . Well , in this manner , hospital will benefit and will have improvement . In the same scenario , maybe , most of the patients cannot afford the price of medication , thus , not enabling them from acquiring the needed service . The result of making the price to high is quality of medical service for the hospital but fewer patients that can afford to acquire the service
Now , let us look at the scenario in which prices are set to be too low Since the medical service is too low , the purchasing power increases Hence , more patients can avail the services offered by hospital but because of the low cost of medication , the quality of medical service is sacrificed . Hospitals and other medical institutions will have a lower funding for quality improvement , and they can even find way in pushing away patients for they may lose the business aspects , that is only possible when the prices are very very low . Hence , the result of having the price is too low is more can afford the services but quality is sacrificed
In the end , hospitals are forced to give up one of these two thing - quality of service and number of patients serve . Unless one is given less importance , both of these will be ineffective
Gaumer Gary (December 22 , 1994 . Hospital Wage and Price Control Lessons from the Economic Stabilization Program . 1 July 2007 PAGE 1
Why do price controls require hospitals to make a trade-off between quality of medical services and number of patients served ...
More Studies on medical, price, patients, Economic Stabilization Program, Price Control
Customers Who Downloaded This Essay Also Viewed
- Current State of the Health Care Industry
- How does the concept of opportunity cost apply to production possibility curve [ppc] analysis ?Describe how four factors of production form the basis of the circular flow.
- The U.S. Housing Market
- Social Security and Medicare, long term time bombs for the budget and the economy ??
- “Sub-Prime Mortgage Loans offer both benefit and dangers for the financial system and the real economy.” Discuss.
Related searches on Price Control, Economic Stabilization Program, Gaumer Gary
- price courseworks
- sample studies on Gaumer Gary
- essays on Economic Stabilization Program
- price analysis
- merits of Economic Stabilization Program
- disadvantages of Economic Stabilization Program
- advantages and disadvantages of Economic Stabilization Program
- Economic Stabilization Program summary
- cause and effect of Gaumer Gary
- Economic Stabilization Program fallacies
- Gaumer Gary test
- advantages of price
- price introduction