Rate this paper
  • Currently rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.50 / 2
Paper Topic:

Transactional Leadership VS: Transformational Leadership

Running Head : TRANSFORMATIONAL VS . TRANSACTIONAL LEADERSHIP

Transformational Leadership versus Transactional Leadership : A Review

Name of Client

School of Client

Teacher of Client

Subject of Client

Abstract

Transformational and transactional leadership differ mainly on the driving force behind them . For transformational leadership , presence of a strong leader , with intellect and charisma to inspire his subordinates , is one of its greatest strength . Creativity is encouraged from the side of the workers . Transactional leadership relies on the reward system-the commitment drawn from the subordinates ' lies on the awards that one

will receive once a task is completed . Development of creativity is not imperative . Various studies had investigated the role of these two leadership styles in the real world . Significant differences between these two were observed- in the creativity it can inspire out of the workers and in the strength of belief for the leadership styles

Transformational Leadership versus Transactional Leadership : A Review

In the modern era , the concept of leadership does not only include those observed in government officials as the designated heads of public offices . Leadership , in its broadest sense , can also be seen to play major roles in small communities , such those in governing bodies in schools , organizations and even in larger units of conglomerates such as those in multi-million companies (Aarons , 2006

Leadership as a discipline had long been theorized to have various approaches . Sir Gregory Burns , the leading proponent of the modern day leadership theories , introduced to the academic community two opposing styles : transformational and transactional leadership (Boje , 2000 . To simply state what Sir Burns had formulated in 1978 , a transformational leader focuses on inspiring its subordinates to finish the task in hand that will eventually be for the benefit of all of those under the leadership . That the contribution of one is for a higher need or purpose for the whole group . The concept of selfless service is important to note here . Also , in to finish a job in hand , the creativity of the subordinates is encouraged in this type of leadership . As opposed to this , transactional leadership is an approach for leaders to drive his subordinates to accomplishment their work in to get a reward Politis , 2004 . If the desired results are achieved with the current method used by the group , the leader does not encourage deviation from the current approach . The former relies on the charisma , intellect passion and heroic grandeur of the leader while the former 's strength lies on the satisfaction that a follower can acquire after the task is done , and of course , this will be in the form of rewards (Boje , 2000

These concepts had been extensively used by the academic and psychological community to assess the impact of these two approaches in the performance of certain groups of people . In a study conducted by Pastor et a .l in 2006 , a survey on the type of leadership of 76 presidents and CEO 's in Spain revealed that the leaders who 's desire was for their people to learn were...

Not the Essay You're looking for? Get a custom essay (only for $12.99)