The Testimony of the Evangelists
At present time it is practically proved , that the Gospels were written by direct witnesses , or , at least , on the basis of the first-hand information . Thus , evangelical descriptions are recognized historically authentic . So , how it was proved that all evidences of evangelists were truthful The investigation "Greenleaf Analysis ' is based on principles are used in jurisprudence and now . Reliability of evidence depends , firstly , on frankness of recognitions secondly , on competence of the witness thirdly , on quantity and sequence of evidence fourthly , on conformity of evidence to the standard experience fifthly , on

concurrence of evidence to the minor facts and events . Simon Greenleaf led the strict analysis of four Gospels on the basis of these five principles his work became precedent in history of jurisprudence . Many outstanding lawyers continued his researches
Analysis 1 Were the attestations frank
To be sincere in the recognition means to trust in authenticity of event . Reading the Gospel everyone collides with simple and sincere narrations of events , failures of Christ 's pupils , severity of His doctrines and His painful internal struggle at idea about death . On Greenleaf 's deep belief all four evangelists : Matthew , Mark , Luke and John were the fair people , testified that they saw , heard and felt , and about what they told frankly
Analysis 2 Were the writers of Gospels competent
S . Greenleaf considers that competence of witnesses depends on such factors as : an opportunity of the witness to observe event , skill to estimate correctly a situation and ability to remember . Is it possible to explain these three factors
a )Having been Jesus Christ 's pupils Matthew , Mark , Luke and John had a lot of time and opportunity to observe the events occurring in His life John described Jesus Christ 's death penalty he directly was the witness of (John 19 , 16-37 . Matthew 's and Luka 's narrations tell us that Peter was present at court , that they three were witnesses of Jesus Christ 's crucifixion too (Matthew 26 , 57-75 Luka 23 , 49 . John and Peter became witnesses of that Jesus Christ 's tomb after His funeral appeared empty (John 20 , 3-8 revived Jesus Christ (John 20 and 21 chapters ) at various times appeared to Matthew , Luka and Peter
b ) The evangelist Luka was the doctor , Matthew was the collector of taxes before his joining group of Jesus ' pupils . Both of them were rather pragmatic people with advanced professional ability to carefulness of the researches and reports , and to the analysis of the done work . They were people on which judgement it was possible to rely
c ) In connection with all aforesaid , there is no need to put under doubt mental faculties of four witnesses of the Gospel . The rank of ignorant fishermen ' is hardly applicable to the authors of four Gospels . The fact that the Jews wrote Gospels in Greek proves that they were not illiterate or uneducated people as they could be represented
Analysis 3 Quantity of evangelical certificates and identity of their statement
The quantity of evangelical testimony is more than...
More Papers on analysis, testimony, Jesus Christ, Jesus, evangelists
Customers Who Downloaded This Essay Also Viewed
Related searches on Jesus Christ, Jesus, Greenleaf Analysis
- testimony courseworks
- sample courseworks on analysis
- courseworks on Jesus
- Jesus analysis
- merits of analysis
- disadvantages of Jesus Christ
- advantages and disadvantages of Greenleaf Analysis
- Greenleaf Analysis summary
- cause and effect of evangelists
- Greenleaf Analysis fallacies
- Jesus test
- advantages of Greenleaf Analysis
- Jesus introduction





