To Spank or not to Spank
To Spank or not to Spank 2007 Abuse involves cruel or violent treatment of another human being especially any kind of sexual assault . The Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act of 1996 defines child abuse as `any recent act of failure to act , on the part of a parent or caretaker , which results in death serious harm , sexual abuse , or exploitation , or an act or failure to act which presents an imminent risk or serious harm (Haley and Stein 2005 , pp . 54-55 ) This abuse can include any type of physical violence

such as : spanking , punching , kicking , or even burning a child . Sexual abuse of a child involves any type of sexual activity involving that of a child and an adult . Emotional abuse incorporates any act on a child that will impair his ability to lead an emotionally stable life Research pertaining to the detrimental effects of corporal punishment on a child 's emotional and physical well being has shown that whether corporal punishment is used every day , once a week or once a month there are lasting harmful effects to the children involved
Some of the physical and emotional effects of parents using corporal punishment on their child can be seen immediately . Along with physical damage such as redness , swelling and bruises , there is also significant emotional damage . Loss of trust and confusion are immediate and very detrimental to a young child . There are also many consequences that remain hidden for years , which may cause these children to suffer from fear , aggression , and depression . The research on long-term effects of corporal indicate that there are specific types of behaviours are found primarily in children raised in homes where corporal punishment , or punishment inflicted upon their bodies was used . Even later in life as these children grew into young adults the lasting effects of physical punishment could still be seen . The association of love with violence that is learned through corporal punishment causes antisocial and violent behaviour later in life (Straus , 1994 Greven , 1991 Flynn 1999 . Children and spouses of individuals who were spanked have a much higher risk of being battered (Straus , 1994 . According to a 1985 National Family Violence Survey published by Murray Straus , the risk of drug and alcohol abuse is also much higher in the population of children whose parents spanked them . The use of drugs and alcohol may create an escape for those individuals looking for a diversion from their traumatic memories of perceived rejection as children (Straus 1994 . A child who is spanked not only absorbs the blows , but the message the blows convey , You 're worthless , I reject you
Murray Straus , author of Beating the Devil Out of Them , writes , No one of us can show that anything bad happens if we do not hit children (Straus , 2000 ,
.1 . The messages that are conveyed to children through spanking are very confusing . The way spanking looks and feels must be confusing to a child when being administered by a parent who is supposed to...
More Papers on children, child, abuse, spanking, Child Abuse Prevention
Customers Who Downloaded This Research Paper Also Viewed
Related searches on Child Abuse Prevention, Straus Greven Flynn, Straus Riak
- Child Abuse Prevention papers
- sample essays on Child Abuse Prevention
- reports on children
- Straus Riak analysis
- merits of children
- disadvantages of Straus Greven Flynn
- advantages and disadvantages of Child Abuse Prevention
- Straus Greven Flynn summary
- cause and effect of spanking
- child fallacies
- spank test
- advantages of spanking
- abuse introduction





