REVIEW THE UNITED STATE GOVERNMENT WEBSITE ( WWW.USA.GOV). NOW COMPARE IT TO THE EUS WEBSITE WWW.EUROPA.EU ( BE SURE TO ENTER THROUGH EN IF YOU WNAT IN ENGLISH). ARE THESE EFFECTIVE PROPAGANDA TOOLS? EVALUATE AND COMPARE.
Websites as propaganda tools : Yea or Nay Usually companies launch their own websites so that the markets that they want to invade ' can be exposed to the company , building a forum for the rapport to be established between the corporate entities and their potential customers . Or some utilize the internet to espouse a cause or belief that certain people want to share with other groups in a way that would not entail a great amount of time and effort . Or others such as the two websites discussed here , tend to be for the

spreading of ideas to help a person (Merriam Webster , 2008
The two sites , for the United States government and for the European Union (EU , seem to fall into the definition very nicely . Put head to head , the two facilities tend to be about equal in its navigation processes that greatly assist any first-timer to their sites . One thing that seems to give the United States site a bit of an advantage is its FCIC Multi language Gateway (OCSC , 2008 . Though the European Union does also have translations of the site in other languages , the United States site reaches out to a more diverse group , rather than the EU site that caters more to the residents of the Union . If the criteria will be strictly based on their effectiveness as propaganda tools , the U .S . site gains the advantage
As earlier stated , propaganda tools are used to communicate ideas easily to more people . Here , the U .S . site seems again to win the upper hand , as it comes with a considerable variety of s for any visitor student or just a surfer on the internet . Though the EU site does offer more of the same , propaganda does not only include the ability to communicate . It also involves the ease to communicate the idea to the audience . The ideas or s must be accessible with a relative degree of ease that will allow faster transmission of the ideas to the intended audience
All in all , both sites are quite adequate tools for propaganda , but the U .S . site has proven to be the more effective tool for disseminating its ideas and s for the people
References
Merriam Webster Online (2008 .Propaganda . Retrieved May 30 , 2008 , from Merriam-Webster website
HYPERLINK "http /www .merriam-webster .com /dictionary /propaganda http /www .merriam-webster .com /dictionary /propaganda
Office of Citizen Services and Communications (2008 . FCIC Multi language Gateway . Retrieved May 30 , 2008 , from OCSC website
Website comparison PAGE 2...
More Essays on union, website, propaganda, compare, United States
- Specify THREE specific controversies of ENVIRONEMNTAL protection and health between the US and EU and their longer-term implications.
- Compare and Contrast Crime and Terrorism
- The United States Since the Fall of the Soviet Union
- European Unity / 1950-2009-Article- Laurent Cohen-Tanugi: The End of Europe?
- Effect of EU immigration on the US
- English
- history questions
- the European Union, its objectives and activities
- CJ 513 3 FINAL EXAM
- Public Law-Process of the Uk Legislative Systems
Related searches on European Union, United States, Merriam Webster
- compare essays
- sample courseworks on compare
- studies on Citizen Services
- OCSC analysis
- merits of union
- disadvantages of website
- advantages and disadvantages of European Union
- Merriam Webster summary
- cause and effect of Merriam Webster Online
- Merriam Webster Online fallacies
- European Union test
- advantages of FCIC
- Merriam Webster Online introduction





