Promissory estoppel can be defined as a promise that the promisor must anticipate rationally in to initiate an action , or forbearance on the part of the promisee or a third party . Furthermore , the promise must induce such an action or forbearance . In addition , if the avoidance of injustice in possible only by its enforcement , then such a promise will be binding . Under the principle of promissory estoppel , a promisor who induces a promisee to change its stance substantially is precluded by estoppel from refusing to accept the binding nature of the promise on
br the grounds that there is a lack of consideration . Therefore , promissory estoppel constitutes an alternative for consideration and it also plays a major role in enforcing a promise that has no consideration (Smith v Harriman Utility Board
The requirements of promissory estoppel are a promise that is crystal clear without ambiguity in its terms and conditions , the proof that the claimant had relied on the promise , such reliance of the claimant should be reasonable and foreseeable , and damages should have emerged from that reliance . Promissory estoppel is a vital device in protecting the interests of the parties to a contract . It is a means of remedy for reimbursing a claimant who had suffered injury due to a promise or representation of other party . In such cases the courts have awarded compensation for breaches of contractual obligations (Feldman , 2004
The doctrine of promissory estoppel under common law requires that a party to a contract , seeking the court 's intervention to obtain legal remedy , has to establish that he had acted with a clear conscience . A right of action is bestowed on a person who suffered damage or a loss due to a breach of the law and the courts enforce this right to remedy However , the state of the claimant 's conscience cannot be proved in claiming a relief . In cases where the plaintiff has said or done something in such a way that had induced the defendant to change his behavior and that reliance was reasonable , the courts may deny awarding a remedy to the plaintiff . The courts have been bestowed with this discretionary power . However , the fact remains that estoppel cannot be considered to be a remedy by the law in jurisdictions of the common law Promissory estoppel is only a shield and not a sword and courts consider the principles of equity . Promissory estoppel is merely a defense , which prevents a plaintiff from seeking action through legal rights , or from invoking a set of facts that would endorse enforceable rights where such enforcement or reliance becomes unfair to the defendant . The area of this remedy is restricted because it contravenes the legal rights of the defendant
The proof of the existence of a contract requires consideration to be extant for that agreement . Thus a contract entails a quid pro quo Consideration can assume any form and it can be either a benefit to the promisee by the promisor or an obligation on part of...
More Reports on promise, estoppel, promissory, High Trees House, Central London Property Trust
- What impact did the High Court’s decision in Walton Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher (1988) 164 CLR 387 have on the development of the law of estoppel in the context of contract law? Then briefly compare(500 words max) the legal position in Australia with
- Was Denning J (as he then was) having a laugh when he propounded the principle of promissory estoppel in the High Trees case? If he was, then the laugh was squarely on the doctrine of consideration. By accident or design, Denning J showed that an inform
- Legal issues
- Residental Contract Law
- business law
- History Guided by a Promise
- (abridged ethnograhy approach or case study): civil and /or human rights activist/transformers. realizing the promise of equality.
- Law of Tort
- Construction Contract Law - Resit
- Lifting the Corporate Veil