Presentation Outline Commentary

Presentation Outline Commentary Factors Determining Self-Categorization Presentation Outline Commentary Factors Determining Self-Categorization This current outline is well organized and to the point , however , it may be so to the point , as to leave the research questions only partially answered . An introduction of the questions that are to be answered along with information that can be gleaned from the readings may be helpful . Adding a literature review section or , at the very least , a bibliography would help to show an audience where the information was gathered and show more credibility . The five

categories already in place in the outline (definition , factors determining self categorization , creation of discrimination and intergroup conflicts case study , and measures to reduce discrimination ) are perfectly ed to flow in a presentation and need no changes , except minor grammatical alterations . Definition ' should be changed to Definitions ' and Case Study ' should be changed to Case Studies , since there are several in each of the two categories . There are other minor changes that need to be made , as well , to be grammatically correct throughout In addition , Definitions ' and Case Studies ' both need expansion in their sub-categories , as the case studies only give an idea of the group being studied but no further information

In the Factors determining self-categorization ' category , the three factors are very vague and need more concrete information and /or examples . Since the presentation requires an in-depth analysis of self-categorization factors , this section should be more comprehensive It would be helpful to look at a textbook chapter and...