Morals and Justice in the courts
Every developed society recognizes the fact that the peaceful running of such a society essentially requires an . Consequently , there is a need to have an established system that curtails the excesses of man . A system that is fair yet does not compromise its principles , a system that upholds equity in judgment , a system that lacks sentiments and respects no gender , status or age . This system is the system of justice Justice is blind - this has been a lifelong saying . This is informed from the statue that depicts the basic feature of justice . Justice

as a concept involves different principles . Justice should be objective and should treat each person as an end in themselves . The statue of law shows that justice strives for equity and fairness in its judgment Apart from these , justice is blind . It is no respecter of persons or status . She holds a sword in her hand which signifies her power and that she is ready to mete judgment in the appropriate measure that the offender deserves
A closely related term that many people confuse with justice is morality . By definition , morality talks about rightness and wrongness Its scope reaches the area or what is right , how we should act in the society , what is required of the citizens of a state and what should be acceptable or frowned at by the society . As opposed to law , morality preaches what should be done in the society . We ca say that morality is rather subjective as there is no universal way of measuring morality Apart from this , morality is not the same , it is not universally acceptable or fixed like in the case of law
However , it has been an issue of scholastic discussion the issue of how justice and morality /ethics relate . It should be noted that the concept of justice does not necessarily validate the concept of morality . What justice approves of is different from what is considered moral or ethical . What morality preaches are not at all times provided for by the justice system . This has raised a lot of questions by scholars and philosophers engaged in moral or ethical debate . At this point , it becomes imperative to identify and highlight the difference that exists between the concept of justice and the concept of morality
In the concept of justice , what is just is informed by the provisions of the law . Therefore , the justice system has been criticized to be restricted in nature . Essentially , there is a difference between what is legal and what is moral . Although there are some provisions under the law that frowns at immoral acts , we can not claim that morality is the basis of law . As a result of this , we can say that all illegal actions are immoral but not all immoral actions are illegal . The justice and court system is guided by the law and its operation is guided by the provisions of the law
Furthermore , it becomes an issue subject to questioning that the justice system allows...
More Studies on courts, justice, Clarendon Press, Morals
Customers Who Downloaded This Essay Also Viewed
Related searches on Clarendon Press, Morals, justice
- Clarendon Press essays
- sample reports on justice
- studies on justice
- justice analysis
- merits of Morals
- disadvantages of justice
- advantages and disadvantages of Clarendon Press
- Clarendon Press summary
- cause and effect of Clarendon Press
- Clarendon Press fallacies
- Clarendon Press test
- advantages of justice
- courts introduction





