Media studies classical discourse
Your Name Professor 's Name Course Date The Role of Aristotle 's Rhetoric in Marc Anthony 's Oration Marc Anthony 's speech during Julius Caesar 's burial is an effective incorporation of Aristotle 's rhetoric , which helps him persuade his audience to shift allegiance from Brutus ' and his co-conspirators ' side to Julius Caesar 's . An extensive examination of Aristotle 's rhetoric will reveal the techniques used by Marc Anthony in his speech . The diction in an argument can be very powerful that it can first disguise its original intent

until it has already achieved it
In Book I of Aristotle 's Rhetoric , Aristotle compares rhetoric to dialectic . Dialectic is defined as discussion and reasoning by dialogue as a method of intellectual investigation ' while rhetoric is identified as the study of writing or speaking as a means of communication or persuasion (Merriam-Webster ) Aristotle believes that the two are mirror images ' because they can both be used in formulating a solid argument and in arguing common knowledge s instead of specialized sciences (Murphy et al 62 . Rhetoric is considered an art because it can be taught and therefore , can be learned
Rhetoric appeals to the emotions and can be used as an alternative defense against physical attacks . Once all the means of persuasion has been used and the audience is still not persuaded , the rhetoric is not considered a failure (Murphy et al 62 . However , the speaker has to be well aware of the emotions that are involved in the argument , especially the emotions of the audience , in to know how to handle the issue to his or her advantage
According to Aristotle , rhetoric can be used in discussing political s such as revenue , war and peace , national defense , trade , and legislation . The mental exercise is important in ensuring that the government or any political party receives necessary checks that will prevent corruption or mismanagement . Moreover , rhetoric is used in discussing ethical s , which are abundant , as people continue to classify whatever is good or bad for humanity . Aristotle further discusses the use of different emotions used in rhetoric , in which in the case of Marc Anthony 's speech , the focus will be on two emotions pity and anger . Aristotle regards the emotions as temporary and believes that the orator can present the right emotion at the right time to achieve the needed reaction from the audience . In law courts emotional states ' play an important role in winning a case (Murphy et al 62
When discussing the emotion of anger , one of the theories that Aristotle discusses is that anger becomes a more common reaction to the unexpected . Anger flares more if the cause is brought about by a friend rather than an enemy it is unexpected , and has potential to cause more pain . In Aristotle 's rhetoric , anger has many causes . Belittlement of self and beloved people results to anger , because it affects the ego of the person who regards himself or herself superior (Murphy et al 92 If he...
More Studies on studies, caesar, classical, Aristotle, Discourse
- The Murder of Julius Caesar
- Betrayal in Julius Caesar
- Discuss the differences in classical and modern rhetoric. Identify some of the characteristics of each, the changing anatomy of rhetoric, and some of the major theorists and movements. Incorporate the diffrent soci-political climates and other factors rel
- Cleopatra
- N/A
- Julius Caesar
- Public honor vs. internal virtue
- The Rise of Rome and Archaelogy
- The difference between classical and modern rhetoric
- The Views of Augustus
Related searches on Aristotle, Julius Caesar, Anthony
- Julius Caesar essays
- sample papers on Anthony
- essays on Anthony
- caesar analysis
- merits of Julius Caesar
- disadvantages of Julius Caesar
- advantages and disadvantages of caesar
- Discourse summary
- cause and effect of caesar
- Marc Anthony fallacies
- Before Marc Anthony test
- advantages of caesar
- Julius Caesar introduction





