Rate this paper
  • Currently rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.33 / 6
Paper Topic:

Integrative Approaches to Psychology and Christianity (2004) BY Entwistle,

Running Head : Entwistle 's Book Review

Title : Entwistle 's Book Review



Book Review : Entwistle , D (2004 . Integrative Approaches to Psychology Christianity . Eugene : Wipf Stock


The book Integrative Approaches to Psychology Christianity highlights the work of God from two specific perspectives of Christianity and Psychology . This is achieved by combining theoretical foundations of the two concepts , with Christianity being represented by the Holy Bible that illuminates God 's word to people from all walks of life . Psychology is on the other hand represented by what Entwistle calls

The Book of God 's Work , which is illuminated in His creation - especially human beings and their behavior (Entwistle , 2004 ,

. 166 . Humanity seems to see Christianity and Psychology as two opposites that should not mix whatsoever the point is being illegitimated in the book . After all both Christianity and Psychology precipitate from God 's creation meaning that they can coexist harmoniously . God the Creator gave his people the science of psychology by creating human behavior , which psychologists strive to understand . Additionally , He gave his people Christianity through theological perspectives illuminated in His Holly Word (Entwistle , 2004 ,

. 175 . This understanding forms the basis of combining both Christianity and Psychology in day-to-day living it further helps in the process of motivating colleagues to embark on changing their hard stance on one discipline while taking the other for granted . The long-term result is nothing short of highly effective measures of integrating theological and psychological teachings into unified disciplines that benefit all making for generations

There are several models that can be used in combining Christianity and Psychology into harmoniously for the common good of all humanity . The models include : colonialists , spies , neutral parties , enemies , and allies - all of which make One Sovereign entity . It is the enemies model that sees the two disciplines as unmixable and should be kept separate at all costs . Individuals applying this model usually pick one side and stick with it . For instance , Christians with deep beliefs on separation between the two could hardly get convinced on the importance on incorporating psychology in their theological thinking . This makes it hard for having psychology being adopted in the mainstream Christianity as it is thought to be too radical and opposed to theological teachings The spies ' model stipulates that each side (Christianity and psychology invades the other juts to take away what works in specific situations This becomes a way of avoiding the adoption of many concepts either side , which cultivates supremacy that ends up destroying the much-needed harmony . Such measures can be taken at both individual and organization level . In the former , individuals are free to incorporate concepts independent of the institutions (like church ) they could be associated with . At the organizational level , churches , or other institutions have policies or guidelines stipulating how members should deal with psychological concepts that could be questioning their faith . With regard to colonialists ' model , each of the disciplines embarks on elaborative efforts of dominating the other , the goal being to be the sole...

Not the Essay You're looking for? Get a custom essay (only for $12.99)