Human rights

(name (professor (subject (date

Human Rights

Human beings are equally born with inalienable rights . These undeniable rights allow people to pursue lives of dignity accordingly , no government can bequeath them , but rather all governments should guard them . Persons are all in the same way entitled to human rights without discrimination . Liberty built on a foundation of respect , dignity tolerance , and justice regardless of social standing , political association , religion , or ethnicity allows people to purse these basic rights . The rights provided are all indivisible , interdependent and interrelated . Because human rights are

inalienable , the general rule is that it could not be taken away except in particular circumstances provided by law and according to due process

Freedom of Speech

Freedom of speech is one of the most dangerous rights for the reason that the right signifies the autonomy to articulate one 's discontent with the status quo and the need to change it . As such , it is one of the generally threatened privileges with governments all over the world trying to restrain it . Nevertheless , freedom of expression and speech particularly concerning political and other public matters , is the lifeblood of every democracy . Such freedom is one of the most basic rights that every person enjoys . Democratic governments do not have power over the substance of most verbal and written speech . That is why democracies are generally filled with several voices conveying diverse or even contrary opinions and ideas . The United States , perhaps like no other country , has identified the significance of freedom of speech to protect democracy and the nation 's development

The Framers of the United States Constitution ensured freedom of expression and speech to the citizens with the First Amendment , which in part reads , Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech (Freedom of Speech

.1 . Throughout the two centuries since the implementation of the First Amendment , the United States Supreme Court alleged that several types of expression or speech may be regulated Together , the Court has approved protection to various areas of expression that the Framers obviously had not considered . For instance the Court has decided that the First Amendment grants no safeguard to child pornography , obscenity , or speech that amounts to advocacy of the employment of force or of law defiance , if such advocacy is focussed in producing or inciting impending lawless action and is expected to produce or incite such action . Even speech that benefit from the broad protection of First Amendment may be subject to regulations of the place , time , and conduct of expression even though it is content-neutral . Further , a speech may be closely personalized to serve the considerable interest of the government , or leave open sufficient substitute channels of communication . Further , the protection may be limited if the government demonstrates that the restraint serves to uphold an undeniable interest of the State and the speech is the least qualified means to promote the expressed interest

Torture

Torture is a grave infringement of human rights and is severely outlawed by international law...