HUMAN CHIP IMPLANTS

br Fourth Amendment and one of these searches is the electronic surveillance which reveals the privacy of persons without their consent (Macgee Maquire , 1999 . Two implications about human rights abuse are made in the use of the human microchip implant the attachment of the surveillance device on humans and the continued monitoring of the person once the device is in the body . The ability of the microchip implanted into the body to read-write and track predisposes individual personal information to be revealed (Alam , 2010 . Even if the read-only devices are used , they can

be easily be scanned by the police and unauthorized searches violates the Fourth Amendments

At the same time , the use of microchip implants would violate the Fifth Amendment since the application of the microchip could be one form of self-incrimination where the device presents some tracking capabilities which breach the Fifth Amendment which provides that no citizen shall be forced to witness against himself (Macgee Maquire , 1999 . Although the Amendments refer specifically to verbal self-incrimination , it has been argued that the Amendment applies to modern technologies which forcibly take the evidence from someone

Another violation of the implantation of microchips involves the internal property interest (Alam , 2010 . The chip installation involves the breaking into the skin and implanting the device just the similar ways a pacemaker or an artificial eye . In the case of eye and pacemaker implants , the procedure is acceptable for medical reasons . Contrary , in the case of human chip implants where the aim of the gadget is for the accounting system as well as to act as a repository for government information

In general , the human chip implants pose a number of ethical and legal issues despite their potential applications in ensuring security and tracking lost and kidnapped individuals . It is important to enact appropriate...