Greek & Roman

p Comparison : The Parthenon and the Arch of Constantine

[NAME]

[INSTITUTION]

Comparison : The Parthenon and the Arch of Constantine

The Parthenon (447 - 438 BCE , as made by Greeks , and the Arch of Constantine (313 CE , built by Romans , are ideal examples of art and architecture of the respective civilizations . In terms of form , both similarities and differences are easily seen . For one , both the Parthenon and the Arch of Constantine exhibits the use of a rectangular frame moreover , the significance of height in both structures is comparable as well . It

is also evident that the Arch of Constantine is detailed with various friezes and writings easily visible on its outermost portions (Menichella , n .d ) while the Parthenon has friezes and even sculptures (Silverman , n .d . In contrast , the Parthenon utilizes actual pillars for structural support (Silverman , n .d , while pilasters between columns are its most likely counterpart in the Arch of Constantine (Menichella , n .d

While the overall structure and form of the previously mentioned works are mainly similar in most aspects , such cannot be said for the subject matter depicted . The Arch of Parthenon literally highlights the legacy and achievements of Constantine especially in his battle against Maxentius particularly , the different events that led to the victory are also depicted throughout the faces of the arch with only a minimal reference to deities (Menichella , n .d . On the other hand , the focus upon religious themes in the design of the Parthenon is undeniable . Not only are mythical creatures depicted in...