Forced Drug Testing
Pre-Trial Drug Testing 1 Pre-Trial Drug Testing A Reaction on the Pre-Trial Drug Testing Program name school professor subject Pre-Trial Drug Testing 2 Abstract This contains the opinion of the author regarding the pre-trial drug testing program of the government . The author adopted the position that pre-trial drug testing is an ineffective program as they are based on faulty assumption and not supported by findings of research or studies . The program also infringes on the accused ' right to be presumed innocent until proven guilty Pre-Trial

Drug Testing 3
Pre-Trial Drug Testing
I believe that pre-trial drug testing is ineffective because they are based on faulty assumptions
Pre-trial drug testing is a universal policy which was developed by the government in 1995 at the instruction of then President Bill Clinton The policy requires that federal arrestees , before being released to the community pending trial need to undergo a mandatory drug test . Clinton 's rationale for the policy is to help cure drug addicts at the earliest possible stage . According to Clinton , too often , the same criminal drug users cycle through the court , corrections and probation systems still hooked on drugs and still committing crimes to support their habit (cited in Bureau Of Justice Assistance Bulletin , 1999 . Aside from this , the government also saw this as an opportunity to be able to lessen the possibility of arrestees failing to attend the hearing of their cases and reduce pre-trial misconduct (Bureau Of Justice Assistance Bulletin , 1999 . However , studies and researches do not seem to provide support for such kind of assumption . In the research brief which the National Institute of Justice (NIJ (1996 ) released , their findings revealed that drug use cannot be conclusively used to predict pre-trial misconduct . The research revealed mixed results and there was no significant data to support the assumption of the government . Aside from this , Michelle Calderon cited in her article , Should Defendants be forced to take a Drug Test (2005 , another study by the NIJ revealing that those who had more serious initial arrest charge had a greater likelihood to appear at the trial
Pre-Trial Drug Testing 4
These studies and findings clearly show that there is no positive correlation between
the rationale for the existence of pre-trial drug tests and the danger that the government is trying to avoid . I don 't see the point of maintaining a government policy that is based on faulty assumptions only . Aside from this , I think that the policy violates one of the basic rights of an accused which is to be presumed innocent until proven guilty . It is a basic right recognized not only by the law of the United States but also by the legal system of other countries . This right indicates that the accuser or the victim should first establish the guilt of the accused before the law would punish him . In the absence of substantial proof or evidence beyond reasonble doubt , then the accused can freely go on his way and the law cannot hamper his...
More Reports on drug, testing, forced, NIJ, Drug Testing
- Forced Drug Testing
- forced drug testing
- • Mandatory drug testing in the workplace
- Legal and Ethical Issues of Workplace Drug Testing
- Baseball and Drug Testing
- Persuasive Email About Drug Testing
- Drug Testing in Employment
- Health Insurance
- Mandatory Drug Testing and the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution
- Business
Related searches on Drug Testing, NIJ, Drug Test
- Drug Testing Program essays
- sample papers on Drug Testing Program
- courseworks on drug
- Drug Testing analysis
- merits of Drug Testing Program
- disadvantages of Drug Test
- advantages and disadvantages of Drug Testing
- testing summary
- cause and effect of forced
- Justice Assistance Bulletin fallacies
- testing test
- advantages of forced
- Drug Tests introduction





