Was Firing Him Too Drastic

p NAME OF STUDENT COURSE : BUSINESS NAME OF PROFESSOR DATE

Question 1

Discuss whether or not Kalinsky should have fired his former brother-in law

Michael Kalinsky had every right to fire his former brother- in-law and this is due to

several reasons

David Kenworthy seems to have no respect for his superior and displays it before and

behind him . He was also selfish , and does not have the best interest of the Empryean

organization at heart most of the time , especially in relation to the

Capital One Account

He knew that the company was losing the account but failed to communicate it to

Michael Kalinsky . This is a breach of his fiduciary responsibility , and should be fired on

the basis of that alone

The fact that Michal Kalinsky had been divorced by David 's sister seems to indicate

that there might be some unresolved family issues behind the behavior of the latter . The

climate necessary for proper communications to resolve any conflict or to have

company 's objectives objectively discussed was constantly absent ( HYPERLINK "http /www .janetbluestein .com " \t "_blank www .janetbluestein .com , 05 /12 /10

There was also little time spent discussing the issues that are important to the growth of

the organization and the constant conflict between them would only lead to the reduction

in workers morale and the respect they have for the leadership

The conflict therefore seems more destructive than constructive , and may eventually

lead to others thinking that the manager is incompetent , in terms of controlling...