Evolutionary Psychology

Evolutionary psychology

Brook takes issue with the evolutionary psychology in that judgment on the morals requires a person to make quick rapid decisions that involve good reasoning of the brain . He feels that a person 's emotions act as the basis of the personal morality which is mainly directed by the human brain . Brooks however comes to mention that reasoning may affect the moral aspect of an individual (Elton 2003 . He continues top argue that if reasoning actually affects the personal morality- and in sometimes it does , then this would be a

good reason for doing evolutionary psychology instead of ending it . In addition , there are other reasons for doing evolutionary psychology

Then , Brooks goes on to investigate some of the aspects of evolution psychology that deals with the origin of the peoples ' moral emotions This is in collaboration with other philosophers . However , he gets back to his original statement that speculations on the evolution psychology are irrelevant : this is because he argues that the rise and domination of the approach to morality is a significant period of change (Symons 2000 .This argument challenges all sorts of traditions that may be available in the world . This argument challenges even the written philosophy that seems to be accepted by many people . In addition , the argument challenges Talmudic tradition that that relies heavily in the investigation of what is written in texts . It also poses a challenge to atheists who seem , to be engaged in a war of reasoning against faith and...