Descartes Meditation 2. `I am a thing that thinks`(Cogito)

Running Head : OF EXISTENCE

Of Existence

Full Name

School

Professor 's Name

Class /Course

Of Existence

The well-known argument of the Cogito is Descartes ' philosophical judgment of an individual , particularly referring to I (or himself in his book , Meditations on First Philosophy ' Initially , he wanted to discover and establish one thing only which is certain and indubitable (Descartes , 2007 ,

. 27 . The proposition was I am a thing which thinks (Descartes , 2007 ,

.28 . The argument lies with the Cogito wherein I think , therefore , I am is

lauded . The very notion that is explained here is that I am is defining the existence of a person . In what manner can this be validated

First , we can say that the Cogito is made to be self-validating in the essence that it means what it means . If we try to negate that fact that we think such that we form doubts in saying so , then we are obviously faced with the dilemma that the mere fact that we doubt it means that we think . If not , how would we know that we doubt that we think

Second , the argument of the Cogito could be taken as an inference in the sense that the I think part is the premise , while I exist is the conclusion (Pratt , 2005 , such that while the premise is considered true , it follows that the conclusion is similarly true

Third , Descartes mentioned the principle that whatever is absolutely clear and distinct as an idea is certainly true . Clarity...