Criminal Justice
Criminal Justice Prosecutors and criminal defense attorneys play the central role in the court decision making process , raising the debate and opposing each other using evidence , facts , hypothesis and interviews with witnesses or suspects The role of prosecutor is well known as a charging agent of a criminal case forwarding to the court information , which proves the guiltiness of the suspect . However , there is a misconception about prosecutors trying to make a suspect guilty with any tools accessible to them . The main objective of the prosecutor is not to promote persuasion

of the guiltiness , but rather to present credible evidence related to the crime , which could assist leading the case . Aggressive tactics is allowed , still not favorable , but it should be fair , precise , and subject-related
In the case Boucher vs . The Queen the role of prosecutor is described as follows : The role of the prosecutor excludes any notion of winning or losing his function is a matter of public duty than which in civil life there can be charged with a greater personal responsibility It is to be efficiently performed with an ingrained sense of the dignity , the seriousness and the justness of judicial proceedings
United States Supreme Court demonstrated the same idea about the role of prosecutor , stating that prosecution is not of an ordinary party to a controversy but of a sovereignty whose obligation to govern impartially is as compelling as its obligation to govern at all
Mr . Justice Sutherland commented on the objectives of prosecution which should focus its actions not that it shall win a case but that justice shall be done (Prosecution ) is as much to refrain from improper methods calculated to produce a wrongful conviction as it is to use every legitimate means to bring about a just one
A more complex role in the court process is carried out by criminal defense attorneys . Most of the attorneys base their work on creating a specific scenario of evidence and witness testimonies to create a favorable investigation picture for the defense side , and with the objective to lead the client through the investigation process without having criminal charge d . This process often includes finding compromises and making an agreement by the defendant to cooperate with the authorities . The defense attorneys ' objective is to eliminate the threat of their client being directly accused for a crime , or sometimes they can only significantly reduce the sentence given to a client , who is proven to be guilty . The work of the system is complicated , and the objectives of defense attorneys ma only bring confusions into the court system . Whether the attorney was successful in preventing the conviction of the prosecution against the client or not , it may not always represent the true picture of the case , and therefore may not represent the work of justice
Justice Byron White , who participated in the case United States v . Wade in 1967 , described the role of a criminal defense attorney as follows But defense counsel has no comparable obligation to...
More Reports on justice, criminal, defense, United States, University Press
Related searches on United States Supreme Court, University Press, United States
- criminal essays
- sample papers on justice
- studies on Justice Criminal
- Justice Criminal analysis
- merits of University Press
- disadvantages of United States Supreme Court
- advantages and disadvantages of justice
- justice summary
- cause and effect of Justice Criminal
- criminal fallacies
- University Press test
- advantages of United States
- criminal introduction





