Criminal Justice - Do you consider police deception during interrogation to be ethically justified? Identify the ethical system(s) you are using to support your stance.
Running head : ETHICAL LYING The Morality of the Police Lying to People Being Interrogated John Q . Student Wright State University Abstract The Morality of the Police Lying to People Being Interrogated On a purely utilitarian basis it is clear that society as a whole would benefit if the act of lying to a person during an interrogation resulted in discovering the truth . Of course the weakness of a utilitarian ethical system is that it fails to account for the rights of an individual , in this case the person with rights

that might be violated would be the person being interrogated
One must determine if an individual has the right to be told the truth If there is such a right then there is a corresponding duty for someone to tell the truth to him or her
One must ask him or herself where this alleged right to be told the truth comes from . In Judeo-Christian literature there is a proscription that may apply . In the Ten Commandments the ninth commandment requires that one not make false testimony against one 's neighbor . Does this requirement prohibit lying ? It is clear that all false testimony would be a lie , but it is also just as clear that there are many lies that have nothing to do with making false testimony . If woman asks her husband if he likes her new hairstyle which he thinks is hideous , and he tells her that he does , it is a lie , but does not appear to be false testimony . Even if the Ninth Commandment did prohibit lying , the prohibition does not necessitate that someone has the right to be told the truth
Another possible for such a write may be a natural right . In the Declaration of Independence , Jefferson lists some of these : life liberty , and the pursuit of happiness . There does not appear to be a provision for a right to be told the truth
The last place where such a right may be proscribed is in the Bill of Rights . The First Amendment provides "Congress shall make no law abridging the freedom of speech . or the right of the people peacefully to assemble , and to petition the Government for redress of grievances " One would think that if the Founding Fathers wanted to specify a right to be told the truth they would have done so here where they were specifying other rights . They did not do so . Therefore there does not appear to be a Constitutional Right to be told the truth
In conclusion , it appears that the police lying to persons they are interrogating may provide the greatest good for the people as a whole and that doing so does not violate any rights of the person being question . Therefore , it is not immoral for the police to lie to a person being interrogated
POLICE LYING
POLICE LYING PAGE 1...
More Studies on system, investigation, police, morality, ethical
- Ethics of Deceptive Interrogation
- Have the provisions of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 and the Codes of Practice ensured that police interrogation and investigation procedures are conducted in a fair and reliable manner?
- deception in investigative
- Forensic Science in 21st Century Criminal Justice
- GeoProfiling
- Police Interrogation Techniques: When do they go too far?
- CRIME ANALAYSIS & INVESTIGATION
- Interrogaton Tactics
- Miranda v. Arizona
- Applying the communication theory of Deception to Martin Scorseses 2006 film `The Departed`
Customers Who Downloaded This Essay Also Viewed
Related searches on First Amendment, Wright State University, Police Lying
- police papers
- sample studies on First Amendment
- papers on lying
- Interrogated analysis
- merits of Interrogated
- disadvantages of Ninth Commandment
- advantages and disadvantages of ethical
- police summary
- cause and effect of investigation
- system fallacies
- interrogation test
- advantages of ethical
- Police Lying introduction





