Criminal Investigation (Week # 7) Discussion Question
As crime rates in the United States escalate , solvency of individual incidents may not be enough . Law Enforcement Authorities must be able to develop strategies for addressing future events by means of studying the past . Statistical compilation systems like that of the Uniform Crime Report (UCR , the National Incident-based Report System (NIBRS ) and the National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS ) have played a crucial role in the furtherance of this goal . Throughout the following we will examine the specific aspects of each system , differences in relation to one another as well as accuracy issues

that may arise
1927 brought the initial development of the Uniform Crime Report (UCR ) through the ideologies of The International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP . Now maintained by the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI , the primary goal of the UCR is to generate crime statistics , as they pertain to individual geographical locations , by local reporting of crime as to seriousness , frequency and pervasiveness whether or not an arrest has occurred . Criminology Units , Legislative platforms and Social Science Services find great benefit in this type of reporting as their research and planning processes can be supported by the input data . Compilations of these statistics are posted annually via publications such as Crime in the United States , Hate Crime Statistics ' and Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted Additionally , preliminary reports are published semi-annually Currently 17 ,000 agencies are included in the collaboration of UCR generated statistics (Federal Bureau of Investigation , n .d
Data collections for the UCR entails , the voluntary reporting by city , county , state , tribal and federal agencies in regards to criminal acts committed as know to police with or without arrest . The information gathered falls under strict federal guidelines and must adhere to uniform definitions of crime within a standardized scoring system . It is noteworthy to mention that when reporting , law enforcement officials must follow the crime definitions as determined in the UCR Handbook , and not within the scope of their state statutes Under the guidelines as set forth in the handbook , all data reported is required to be classified as one of two categories , Part I or Part II Offenses . Part I offenses include felonious homicide , rape , arson burglary , robbery larceny-theft , auto theft and aggravated assault Part II offenses , with the exception of traffic offenses , cover all crimes not mentioned in Part I . These reports are submitted monthly to mandated repositories within the agency 's respective state . Reports are then forwarded to the Federal UCR Program , reviewed for accuracy and reasonableness , then input into a national database (Federal Bureau of Investigations , n .d
In 1985 , the FBI enhanced reporting capabilities and analyses systems by introducing a summary level data collection system known as the National Incident-based Reporting System (NIBRS . Reporting data in the NIBRS is a partnered effort between FBI , local , state , federal agencies and professional organizations . Distinct aspects of the NIBRS are much expanded offense categories , a multi-level and incident-based reporting . Incident-based reporting systems allow for the input of detailed data unique to...
More Papers on criminal, investigation, week, United States, UCR
Customers Who Downloaded This Coursework Also Viewed
Related searches on Discussion Question, National Crime Victimization Survey, UCR
- criminal papers
- sample courseworks on Discussion Question
- courseworks on National Crime Victimization Resource
- investigation analysis
- merits of NCVS
- disadvantages of Enforcement Authorities
- advantages and disadvantages of National Crime Victimization Survey
- criminal summary
- cause and effect of Enforcement Authorities
- United States fallacies
- criminal test
- advantages of UCR
- NCVS introduction





