Rate this paper
  • Currently rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.00 / 1
Paper Topic:

Cost between RedHat vs Win2003

Running Head : Red Hat Linux 4 vs . Win2003

Costs between Red Hat Linux 4 and Windows 2003

Name

Professor

Subject / Course

School / University

April 22 , 2007

The Windows Server 2003 and the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 are two server operating systems that were released specifically in 2003 Windows 2003 was introduced on the 24th day of April 2003 as successor of the Windows 2000 version (Wikipedia , 2007 , par .1 . The Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 server , on the other hand , was released on the 31st of March

on that same year (Wikipedia , 2007 , Red Hat Linux . These two servers have very minute differences in terms of cost and benefits including the license and support costs

With regards to the six-year study conducted by Ideas International Inc (IDEAS ) on 2005 regarding the procurement charges and the support costs of the two computer server versions , it was concluded that : first the enterprise license and support costs of Windows 2003 is competitive with that of Red Hat Linux 4 second , the two versions have different approaches to overall cost , which means that the best pricing comparisons should be based on a period of ownership (3-6 yrs , rather than on just initial acquisition charges (Ideas International , Inc 2005 ,

.1 third and last , it appears that support is integral to both companies , and with Microsoft offering a separate support and license fee apart from Red Hat - which offers combined subscription and support - Microsoft appears to be better and cheaper after six years of acquisition (Ideas International , Inc , 2005 ,

.1 . But in the initial years or from the 1st to below 4th year of acquisition , Red Hat appears to be better and cheaper . As indicated in the appendix in the next page , before year 4 , Red Hat appears to have fewer overall costs , but by year 4 the costs of both products would be equal , and after year 4 Microsoft would be cheaper by about 16 . This is because Microsoft offers programs that bundle in other value not available in the retail versions (Ideas International , Inc , 2005 ,

.2 . This type of cost-effective program . Red Hat Linux does not just have

Appendix Source : Ideas International , Inc , 2005 ,

.1

Works Cited

Ideas International , Inc (2005 , August . White : Microsoft windows Server vs . Red Hat Enterprise Linux : costs of acquisition and support . Port Chester , NY : IDEAS Custom Consulting Services

Wikipedia Encyclopedia (2007 . Red Hat Linux . Retrieved April 22 2007 , from the Wikimedia Foundation , Inc . database : HYPERLINK "http /en .wikipedia .org /wiki /Red_Hat_Linux http /en .wikipedia .org /wiki /Red_Hat_Linux

Wikipedia Encylopedia (2007 . Windows Server 2003 . Retrieved April 22 , 2007 , from the Wikimedia Foundation , Inc . database : HYPERLINK "http /en .wikipedia .org /wiki /Windows_Server_2003 http /en .wikipedia .org /wiki /Windows_Server_2003

Wikipedia Encylopedia (2007 . Windows Server 2003 . Retrieved April 22 , 2007 , from the Wikimedia Foundation , Inc . database : HYPERLINK "http /en .wikipedia .org /wiki /Windows_Server_2003 http /en .wikipedia .org /wiki /Windows_Server_2003

Wikipedia Encyclopedia (2007 . Red Hat Linux . Retrieved April 22 2007 , from the Wikimedia Foundation , Inc . database : HYPERLINK "http /en .wikipedia .org /wiki /Red_Hat_Linux http /en .wikipedia .org /wiki /Red_Hat_Linux

Ideas International , Inc (2005 , August . White : Microsoft windows Server vs . Red Hat Enterprise Linux : costs of acquisition and support . Port Chester , NY : IDEAS Custom Consulting Services

Red Hat Linux 4 vs . Win2003 PAGE 2 ...

Not the Essay You're looking for? Get a custom essay (only for $12.99)