Rate this paper
  • Currently rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.80 / 5
Paper Topic:

Compare and Contrast motivational interviewing with rational emotive behavior therapy

COMPARE CONTRAST MOTIVATIONAL INTERVIEWING WITH RATIONAL EMOTIVE BEHAVIOR THERAPY

Compare and Contrast Motivational Interviewing with Rational Emotive Behavior Therapy

In APA Style

Name

College

Motivational Interviewing

It is one of the most carefully defined and rigorous treatment for substance abuse (Miller , 1991 . It was developed my William Miller Stephen Rollnick , and other colleagues over the past 2 decades . It uses a concise psychotherapeutic intervention for helping people change an addictive behavior such as a substance abuse . It is intended to assist and enhance a person 's intrinsic

motivation to change addictive behavior in a highly empathetically supportive but strategically directed conversation about the person 's use of substance and related life events

Variety of techniques are used that will increase intrinsic motivation for change . Some useful techniques used are micro skills (open - ended questioning , affirmations , reflections , and Summary or OARS ) and strategies (creating discrepancies between a person 's current behavior and his or her goals , his values , the way he perceived himself establishing and exploring ambivalence and handling resistance skillfully (Miller , 1990

Initially , Miller and his colleagues developed Motivational Interviewing to treat people who have alcohol substance abuse they used principles of motivational psychology and clinical research . If clients have options for alternative approaches they are seem to have an improved treatment and a better outcome . This kind of therapy helped people become realistic , have a set of clear goals which are achievable and possible that will help him or her change for the better

What is motivation ? It is the probability that a person will be ready to change , namely , enter into , continue , and adhere to a specific change strategy . Each one of us can be motivated , and those who are lifeless are only considered unmotivated . But , not only motivation will work alone on this kind of therapy , confrontation is also needed , it is a part of all psychotherapies . The question is not solely based if people should be confronted or not , but how to confront effectively and efficiently that eventually will lead to a successful therapy

Change could not be achieved right away . It takes a lot of time , hard work , and perseverance both for the therapist and the client . Change is hard , but it is essential . Uncertainty or ambivalence is accompanied by change . Every client undergoes this kind of stage where he feels uncertain . This is just a normal part or process of change . Successfully addressing ambivalence is considered to be a crucial skill for a Motivational Interviewing (Miller , 1990

There are four basic assumptions of Motivational Interviewing according to Miller (1990 , they are as follows

Optimistic and humanistic perspective

Motivation is considered to be a condition , not a trait

Approaching change where ambivalence is constant , it is a normal acceptable , and understandable aspect

Motivation is an interpersonal phenomenon

Primarily , clients do not seek therapy because they are motivated . It is the sole responsibility of the therapist to initiate change , and help his or her client to be motivated . It shouldn 't come within from the client...

Not the Essay You're looking for? Get a custom essay (only for $12.99)