The Cloning Industry -- Who Owns a Clone?

Ethical Issues on Ownership of Clones

Human cloning is another which pits ethics against science Cloning is associated with many benefits such as stem cell technology which is classified under therapeutic cloning and may have the capacity to produce organs for which can be used to treat many diseases . This kind of cloning is the main reason why many scientists want to pursue the study of cloning . Reproductive cloning , on the other hand is done to produce a complete human being . However , despite of its potential to provide great benefit to mankind

, cloning , whether therapeutic or reproductive faces many ethical issues one of which is the ownership of the human clone

According to Dr . Arthur Caplan , the director of the Center for Bioethics and Trustee Professor of Bioethics at the University of Pennsylvania and the current chairman of the Advisory Committee to the Department of Health and Human Services , Centers for Disease Control and Food and Drug Administration on Blood Safety and Availability , producing human still has a low probability as animal cloning has not been perfected yet and cloning humans this early would require huge amounts of funding because of the needed number of egg cells . If scientists were indeed able to clone humans , the clone may have deformities and other genetic defects wherein lies another moral issue . He said that scientists who want to try human cloning try not to look into this aspect (Cable News Network , 2001

Human clones when conceived must have all the basic rights that a normal human being has . Being a clone does not necessarily mean that the clone is a lesser being that is owned by someone . The clone must be treated equally . Basic rights include the right to life , right to education , right to free speech , etc . Although the clone is a result of scientific experiments that may either be funded by government or private entities , the clone is still a human being , thus the clone is also protected by existing human rights laws . As a child , the clone must be brought up in a free environment and should not be locked up in a laboratory somewhere for the sake of further studies on human cloning When the clone reaches legal age , he must be allowed to make decisions for himself just like any ordinary human being conceived through the natural reproduction process . The idea of having ownership of a clone is the same of slavery . It is common knowledge that slavery is an act that is strictly prohibited by currently existing laws (Cloning Misconceptions , 1998

Although therapeutic cloning has many medical benefits , it has also been argued that it is not pro-life basically because an embryo may already be considered as alive ' and using the embryo to grow stem cells would mean the termination of a living human . It has been argued that killing one person to save another is unjustifiable (Robinson 2005 . This argument may be true but stem cell technology could provide treatment to many potentially life...