Case Analysis Assignment

Mr . Braun on how to deal with the trading business ensuring that clients and investors are the priority stakeholders in all their transactions . Fundamental Company , as it is engaged in a trading transaction where the operation of trust is at its best , should have developed and implemented policies and control measures to ensure that clientele interests are always protected Fundamental Company should have an air-tight monitoring scheme and feedback system to ensure that employees like Mr . Braun are easily detected , discovered , corrected , and coached to protect investors interests . Superiors , like Mr

. Nathan , should be fully and operationally involved in the transactions of all subordinates by employing effective and efficient tracking and monitoring schemes to ensure that their subordinates perform excellently for the best interest of clients and investors (Ball , 2008

Sad to say , all the above circumstances were not even mentioned in the course of the investigation , hearing , and in the decision of the court The accountability was solely owned by Mr . Braun . Would any gains from such transaction be solely owned by Mr . Braun , too ? The answer would definitely be a resounding NO . So this leaves us with the question - why is Mr . Braun left alone to answer for the losses . It is true that he made a big mistake in misrepresenting statements in the portfolio he made a big mistake in not handling well the investments he made a big mistake by keeping the investors in a blind spot as to the status of their investments and he made a big mistake in not pounding the walls of Fundamental company for HELP . But it is morally wrong to assume that it is only Mr . Braun who should carry on the entire burden of the losses . The company , the immediate superior , the company 's systems , the company 's processes...