Big Bang Theory
Running Head : BIG BANG THEORY Falsifiability of the Big Bang Theory (Name (University (Professor (Subject /Course Title (Date Falsifiability of the Big Bang Theory In one of Karl Raimund Popper 's works , he discussed the demarcation that differentiate the sciences from the non-sciences or those that are merely subjects of faith and pseudo-sciences . Popper believes that sciences are falsifiable . If something can be falsified it can be considered as a science . He argued that unlike the work of Einstein which is capable of conflicting with possible , or conceivable observations , the works

of Freud , Marx and Adler proves every event as compatible to their theories which in Popper 's argument was not scientific . No matter what the situation is , Freud , Marx and Adler would explain it in terms of their theory which is somehow a subjective way of explaining or looking into things . For instance , a selfish capitalist could be analyzed as someone who was fixated to a certain Freudian psychosexual stage or was suffering from Adler 's concept of inferiority Marx would analyze the man from a class-struggle perspective . Popper believes that although there are evidences and observable facts that could prove the three theories through experimentation , these experiments are not falsifiable and are therefore merely based on faith and subjective judgments
In the case of the Big Bang theory , it argues that the universe is expanding . The theory stated that the universe had started from an initial bang or explosion of a very dense material . The impact of the...
More Essays on explosion, science, theory, theories, works
- Phenomenology
- Social Sciences
- cultural
- biological scientist
- one authors significance in today s society
- Forensic Sciences in Criminal Investigations
- Subjective essay
- conference
- 3. Explain, in detail, the four criteria that indicate that a chemical reaction has taken place, giving examples of each type of evidence.
- exploration essay





