Rate this paper
  • Currently rating
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5.00 / 1
views 1347 | downloads 800
Paper Topic:

Should the American Government have to pay reperations to Native Americans? Arguement Essay

Should the American Government have to pay reparations to Native Americans

INTRODUCTION

Since time immemorial , the issue on land ownership is very chaotic because men are willing to wage war just to get hold of a piece of land In primitive times , a certain ethnic group skirmishes with other ethnic groups over territorial supremacy . Land ownership is a bloody business because of the price it entails . When a certain assembly successfully dominated other 's land it means that their goal to expand their territory is realized , but most importantly , domination of

a territory also implies that the dominator also take control of the resources of the grabbed territory . And worst , it has been a practice that the dominator of a territory would likely use the people of their grabbed land , and eventually treat them as slaves . In 1830 's a prominent execution of land grabbing transpired in North America between President Andrew Jackson 's administration and the Native Americans , and more specifically to the Cherokees . During this period , President Jackson endorsed a law that was designed to eliminate the Indian people in their own territory and relocate the latter in other places . The ratification of Indian Removal Act took many years of trial but eventually did not succeeded because the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Native Americans . The objective of the said policy is to exchange lands with Native Americans and to eliminate them from thriving in west of the river Mississippi . According to President Jackson , during the deliberation of Indian Removal Act , that he was so concerned of the plight of the Indians because as civilization progresses and as the whites increasingly occupy the land , the Native Americans conditions are being jeopardize . At its first implementation , the Choctaw and the Chickasaw was successfully relocated . But the Seminole and the Cherokees did not falter , they resisted all forms of aggression of land grabbing because they believed that no one owe their ancestral lands . Desperate measures was implemented , violence against Indians was manifested by use of arms and force . Seminole people triumphed in Second Seminole War against the massive troops of military and volunteers . But in the third installment of war the Seminole people was defeated . The last remaining tribe was the Cherokees , and in a very unfortunate event , they were forced to engage in death march , which was later on called Trail of Tears . President Jackson 's administration successfully seized the ancestral lands of the Indian tribes , but its promise of better life equal opportunities , and relocation is nothing but a farce . The Indian tribes did not receive a permanent land that they can rebuild their lives . The policy failed to reinforce a voluntary expulsion , and worst their dreams and promises was decimated due to fraudulent land agreements . This historical event is the foundation of a human right debate about the moral responsibilities of Americans to Native Americans . According to human right advocators , the means to fulfill this moral responsibility is through reparations . In this , I will...

11 pages
50.0 KB
Free sing-up

Not the Essay You're looking for? Get a custom essay (only for $12.99)