Affirmative Action as a means to diversify the U.S. workforce

Running Head : Affirmative Action As A Means To Diversify The U .S Workforce

Affirmative Action As A Means To Diversify The U .S . Workforce (Author 's Name (Institution 's Name

In the USA , federal affirmative action regulations are supplemented by state and municipal laws and ordinances . Furthermore , the laws that constrain affirmative action in the workplace are related but not identical to those that control affirmative action in university and college admissions . At the federal level , the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC ) and the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP

) are responsible for most equal opportunity and affirmative action regulations and enforcement

When considering the effects of affirmative action , the interests of various stakeholders must be taken into account . The primary stakeholders are the target groups , other non-target groups organizations that have affirmative action plans (AAPs ) and society at large . The phrase 'effects of ' implies a causal relation . However causal conclusions can rarely be drawn in affirmative-action research because scholars cannot control whether organizations have AAPs or the dimensions (e .g . race and gender ) that determine who is targeted by those plans

The purpose of affirmative action is to improve the outcomes of target groups . Research indicates that the size and even the existence of demonstrated benefits on employment have varied across time , location target group and job level (Holzer and Neumark 2000 Smith 2001 . In addition , minority status (African American or Hispanic ) contributes to college and university admission only among the most selective institutions , where it increases the probability of admission by up to 10 per cent (Kane 1998 . Among African Americans , admission to such selective colleges and universities is associated with an increased probability of graduation , post-baccalaureate education and professional success (Bowen and Bok 1998

On the other hand , the use of affirmative action in the USA is associated with decreased employment outcomes for white males (Holzer and Neumark 1999 , 2000 . The relative paucity of 'reverse discrimination ' charges d with the EEOC suggests that these effects are due primarily to the elimination of the privileges often enjoyed by white males rather than to the use of strong preferences for female or minority applicants . Because elite universities reject so many whites and accept so few minority students , the negative impact of affirmative action on white applicants is quite small (Kane 1998 . On a broader scale , the long-term effect of having a diverse student body appears to be positive for all groups and for society as a whole . Diversity in higher education is associated with individual changes in attitudes and abilities that enhance participation and success in an increasingly diverse democratic society (Bowen and Bok 1998 Gurin et al 2004

Opponents of affirmative action argue that workplace AAPs depress the performance of organizations , which are forced to hire less competent employees . Supporters argue that affirmative action improves organizational performance by eliminating economically inefficient discrimination and increasing workforce diversity . Research finds that organizations that use affirmative action in selection tend to hire minority individuals whose educational credentials are slightly lower...