Two essay's 750 words each, details below

Two essay\ 's 750 words each , details below

Essay 1 : Analysis of An Argument

The first sentence of the argument sounds very persuasive and simple If the research is based on a six-year statistics then the data is very reliable . The line Our research indicated that , over the past six years , no incidents of employee theft have been reported within ten of the companies that have been our clients ' tells a lot about the effective work of the security service . The fact that this data refers not to a single company that

is a client of the security service but to ten of them gives more space for thinking that the work of the security service is really on a high level . At least we can say that the security service of the company perfectly copes with its responsibilities that refer to overseeing the correct behavior of the client 's employees Often these procedures are the most difficult , because the working place and working process of each employee is a subject of privacy that is not allowed to be violated

If to read the second sentence better and connect it with what has been said in the first , we can find out that there is some of the misconnection between them . If the company provides the security services for its clients then it has to know everything about the security system that is established within its clients . It 's the basic job of any security service and here in the statement we find out the following line : In analyzing the security practices of these ten companies , we have further learned that each of them requires its employees to wear photo identification badges while at work

It sounds like the company executes the role of the overseer over the security services of the company , but doesn 't provide the security services by itself . Otherwise it there wouldn 't be such a line as analyzing the security practices of these ten companies , we have further learned

These words say that the company doesn 't have a direct relationship to its clients if it doesn 't provide the security service or has no idea about the security practices that are established in these companies

Probably the director 's initial thought was to say that security services that were given to those ten clients had a practice of checking ID badges , while the security practice in other companies did not include that time of security practice . If it was the initial thought then the statement has to sound in another way , otherwise it will be misunderstood by the audience or will make them to perceive it from different sides , and different people will understand the meaning of it differently

The last sentence of the argument makes relatively clear what the speaker wanted to say , but still it doesn 't really sound in the way that would be understood easily and at once

To make the whole argument simpler for understanding it 's necessary...